URL:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?20462>
Summary: Illegal requirement types considered "None" and not
an error
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Tue 29 Jan 2013 02:52:53 AM EET
Category: general
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release:
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: None
Planned Release:
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Due to typo in requirement name I had a long debugging session. The typo
caused no kind of warning from ruleset loading as illegal type name is
silently translated to "None".
universal_by_rule_name():
source.kind = universals_n_by_name(kind, fc_strcasecmp);
if (!universals_n_is_valid(source.kind)) {
source.kind = VUT_NONE;
}
Is there *any* need for requirement type "None" in the first place? One can
leave requirement vector empty if needed. And if there is, would it hurt to
require it to be always explicitly given? I think above code is meant to set
VUT_NONE in case when there's no requirement type at all.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?20462>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
