Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21416 (project freeciv): > Presumably because it predates the names being ruleset > defineable.
Let's add some history here in case it helps with some other issues: 1) Alien ruleset started off as copy from my stub ruleset 2) Both stub ruleset and alien ruleset (until it itself entered freeciv repo) have been kept updated format-wise mainly by diffing default/classic ruleset revisions via our svn repository web-interface http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/freeciv/trunk/data/classic/ 3) It seems something has gone awry (human error most likely) when some specialist related changes were made to ruleset format/default ruleset. I now noticed that stub ruleset, and all rulesets since derived from it have outdated comments documenting specialists. Alien ruleset is an interesting case that it has been somewhat updated, but with poor (copy&paste?) results -> I'll fix that in new ticket. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?21416> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freecivemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev