URL:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22080>
Summary: Non-cumulative Barracks effects not right wrt
building redundancy
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sun 25 May 2014 11:07:28 BST
Category: rulesets
Severity: 2 - Minor
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: In Progress
Assigned to: jtn
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release:
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: Any
Planned Release: 2.5.0, 2.6.0
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The nreqs added in bug #20232 to protect against simultaneous effects from
Barracks / Barracks II cause slightly suboptimal UI:
* Newer Barracks' effects are prevented by presence of older ones, so the
newer buildings are considered redundant. (This can be seen in civ1 ruleset.)
* The HP_Regen effect isn't protected against being cumulative. This has no
gameplay effect (since it's a 100% effect) but prevents buildings from being
considered redundant (in rulesets other than civ1).
This is mostly cosmetic -- "redundant" buildings are displayed with
strikethrough / (*) in clients and are candidates for the "Sell Redundant"
button. It doesn't change the game rules. (I haven't checked if the AI also
uses this notion, but if it does I doubt it changes gameplay much.)
The civ2civ3 ruleset in S2_5 svn already gets all of this right.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22080>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
