On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:32:29 -0400, Boaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Standard disclaimer: non-developer's thoughts follow. > > >The idea of working groups has been proposed a few times by a few > >different people. From my point of view, this seems like a good idea. > >It's time. > > > >There are two questions here. First, what working groups should we > >form. Second, how shall those groups operate? I think if we answer the > >first, each group can answer the second on its own. I'm happy to > >arrange hosted infrastructure to the extent debian.org or github don't > >suit. > > > >We've had many suggestions for which working groups to form. Let's > >gather them in this thread, choose a minimal starting set and see if we > >can define and populate them. > > > >Best regards, > >James > > I think that "anything link layer" is a pretty natural choice for a > subgroup and its own list. That way the mesh people can work in a > dedicated space. No?
Could you define "anything link layer" a little? I understand what you mean, but if we're spinning off lists, maybe we want to do that with some precision to avoid false starts. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
