On 07/15/2011 03:45 PM, James Vasile wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:08:48 +0200, Eugen Leitl<[email protected]> wrote:
Admittedly, the index can get large, but on the hand
SSD has more IOPS.
The box as shipped will have a relatively small subset of possible
packages (just as Debian installation has a small subset of the repo's
packages). My guess is that distributed search is not likely to be in
that small subset. We've always considered search to be somewhat beyond
the scope of the FreedomBox, largely because search is hard and
expensive, even in this distributed fashion.
You mean the Freedombox foundation? Why is that? We're in the business
of distributing/'dehierarchizing' things - as far as I'm concerned,
that's FB's main mission. Search is a very important web tool. Not as
important as a distributed alternative to DNS, but more important than
distributed storage. Many use "the cloud" for storage, but *all* search
the web, and in light of recent auto-complete filters for stuff like
mediafire, dropping all .co.cc domains (actually subdomains, but still),
not to mention the great Chinese firewall, it's important to have a
non-oligopolized alternative. You can encrypt your data and upload it to
multiple cloud services anonymously. But if Google denies to show you a
site, how will you know it exists? I'd vote for a software package such
as YaCy being installed by default, but perhaps unchecked in the 'choose
software' list. Selecting it during the installation, though, would
activate it for the world (depending on further settigns), much like a
proxy, Tor, or anything else.
Luka Marčetić
_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
