> You mean the Freedombox foundation? Why is that? We're in the business of > distributing/'dehierarchizing' things - as far as I'm concerned, that's FB's > main mission. Search is a very important web tool. Not as important as a > distributed alternative to DNS, but more important than distributed storage. > Many use "the cloud" for storage, but *all* search the web, and in light of > recent auto-complete filters for stuff like mediafire, dropping all .co.cc > domains (actually subdomains, but still), not to mention the great Chinese > firewall, it's important to have a non-oligopolized alternative. You can > encrypt your data and upload it to multiple cloud services anonymously. But > if Google denies to show you a site, how will you know it exists? I'd vote > for a software package such as YaCy being installed by default, but perhaps > unchecked in the 'choose software' list. Selecting it during the > installation, though, would activate it for the world (depending on further > settigns), much like a proxy, Tor, or anything else.
+1 , i could elaborate widely, especially on Promoting the adoption of freedom search stack and other corner stone kernels, but i'v though FreedomBox is already for it. > The box as shipped will have a relatively small subset of possible > packages (just as Debian installation has a small subset of the repo's > packages). Where was it decided and when? _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
