On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 16:31 +1000, John Walsh wrote: > Hi Ted, > I am expressing my personal opinion and do not speak for FBF. > > > > I think that the mistake being made most on this mailing list > > is the tendency to devise solutions to complicated problems. > > Sadly, this is just not a thing that can be done on a mailing > > list. If the FreedomBox project exists to integrate existing > > software, devising solutions to complicated problems is > > wholly outside the scope of the FreedomBox. I wonder why such > > discussion is encouraged on this list when there are so many > > better places to go for it. > > I think people are devising solutions to complicated problems because AFAIKT > the software in the "FBF Is/Is Not" mail lists Debian solutions that do not > exist today; > ## Facilitates secure, anonymous and private chat and messaging > * Is the nerve center of your distributed social network. > * Is a platform for federated social networking. > * Is a platform for distributed collaboration. > Do you know Debian software solutions for these requirements?
My point is not that a Debian package exists for all things anyone wants the FreedomBox to do. My point is that it is impossible to solve the difficult problems of constructing such systems on a mailing list alone.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
