On 20 July 2011 19:14, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:46:38AM -0400, James Vasile wrote: [...] >> Dynamic DNS run by a freedom loving group sounds great. I'd use it. It >> also sounds like a whole separate project in addition to the FreedomBox. >> I'm not going to tackle that any time soon, but I'd certainly cooperate >> with anybody who does. > > But then, how would the freedombox interconnect to each others? How would > they be reachable for people outside of the freedombox network? Should > avery onwer register by herself a domain, and then be quite alone and > vulnerable to shutdown/blacklist? > > This project can't just rely on the Tor hidden service onion names, not > everyone will want to have this only solution. > > bert. >
Why not use dyndns/freeDNS for the time being? gnudip2.sourceforge.net is another option, though it does not seem to be maintained anymore. -- Abhishek _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
