On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Marc Manthey - [email protected] wrote: > <snip> > So why we need all this NAT /SIP/STUN / punching stuff ? >
I suggest you carefully study the rate at which replacement technology eliminates that which it is replacing. First ask yourself, how long has IPv6 actually been available? That is, how long have Internet communications equipment suppliers been offering components that support IPv6? Then, how long has it taken major implementers, large Internet Service Providers (ISPs), large network companies, and national governments, to buy IPv6 equipment and place it into service? We are getting closer and closer to running out of IPv4 addresses and I see very little advertising seeking customers for IPv6 or employees able to implement and support IPv6. The first response to the scarcity of IPv4 addresses was companies selling or leasing their unused IPv4 addresses to other companies, regardless of the lack of approval by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Remember, there are 2^32 IPv4 addresses. That represents an enormous amount of capital in the installed base. _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
