hi dkg, > > For example (this is a hand-wavy sketch, not a concrete proposal): > > 0) a freedombox could be known by the fingerprint of its > public key (non-human-readable, OpenPGP or some other > fingerprinting standard) Agree. A couple of months ago I wouldn't have understood this sentence\0/ > > 1) the freedombox itself could publish its own routing > information (DNS records? something else?), signed by its > own public key so that it is clear (and verifiable) how to > reach the machine at the moment. Same as 0. > > 2) individual users could choose to publish (some of) their > petname bindings in a way that is cryptographically > verifiable, thereby creating third-party introductions with > human-readable names. My understanding of this sentence is that you are effectively sharing your address book with a friend (third party). This sounds like a Facebook Friends list, which clicking on one of those friends links takes you to an unreadable url.
I do want to understand the problem, but I can't see the problem. What is it that I don't see? -- fiftyfour _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
