On 11-09-22 at 12:41pm, John Walsh wrote: > Alas, as a Debian Blend with limited resources we are restricted to > using the technologies provided by the Debian project. I realise now > that our website will always look like http://debian.org than the > bling filled http://ubuntu.com which I suspect is Marc's expectation > of a modern website and mine too for that matter. > > I do think the Debian Blend strategy is a good one, but I do think > Debian should allow the blends to have their own distinct brands > rather than being a pale imitation of Debian.org, just like clothing > companies have different shops/brands for different consumers. Sorry, > I digressed in this paragraph.
In my view, a Debian Pure Blend _is_ as boring looking as Debian itself, because it _is_ Debian. What then makes sense is that companies brand various redistributions of (physical boxes containing) the FreedomBox blend of Debian. I would imagine that Canonical would then make their own "Frubuntu" fork, whereas Globalscale Technologies and New IT could be convinced of the selling point of marketing their *Plug hardware as by default containing the _Pure_ blend of FreedeomBox. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
