I just got in to Amsterdam for this conference. Anybody else attending or in Amsterdam this week? I'd love to meet up.
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:04:26 -0600, Nick <[email protected]> wrote: > Is anyone planning on attending the conference? I'd really like to see > some recordings or notes, it seems like a very interesting meeting of > minds. > > Nick > > Apologies for the top-post. > > From: "Carlo v. Loesch" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [secushare-announce] secushare/PSYC at UnlikeUs Conference in > Amsterdam > Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:04:27 +0100 > > > Hello, hackers'n'artists! > > > "Facebook makes everyone believe There Is No Alternative, > but Unlike Us dares to differ." > > We are showcasing our prototype secushare.org application, > a cross-platform end-to-end-encrypted communication and data > exchange tool; independent and obscured from servers, yet > making use of them, thus more elaborate than regular peer- > to-peer technology. > > The UnlikeUs is about understanding social media monopolies > and their alternatives. secushare is being featured as such > an alternative in the making, in a grand opening showcase > this Thursday. If you happen to be in Amsterdam, register > for a free visit at rsvp[at]networkcultures[dot]org. > > http://networkcultures.org/_uploads/UnlikeUsbookletweb.pdf > for the full conference program, including project and > speaker presentations. It looks fabulous! > > I, Carlo v. Loesch, am also invited to a debate on > "Pitfalls of Building Social Media Alternatives" where it > is probably my job to dismantle the myth of usefulness > related to server-based social technology - how good is > your alternative social network, if you can't trust the > server it runs on? Even if you own it? And what in the > world can be good about scattering private data over > dozens of servers in a federation? The entire paradigm > social alternatives have been working on, is broken. > > If you know PSYC, PSYC's new implementation in C is the higher > social messaging layer in the secushare architecture. GNUnet > fulfills lower-level obfuscation and routing jobs, a bit like > Tor does, but more efficiently. PSYC can be compared to XMPP > or JSON over HTTP, only it is on average a dozen times more > efficient than either of those. > > We'd like to thank the UnlikeUs team for inviting us over > and are looking forward to a thrilling conference experience! > > > -- > You are receiving this message because you subscribed to the > secushare or PSYC newsletters, or because you were at the FSW > or CCC events last year, or because I've been knowing you.. > forever. > > -- [email protected] > https://lists.tgbit.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/secu-announce > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
pgpZTFxn8Q8Fc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
