LG> Sad to see that, Tom! But you're right - there is no logic in LG> lawyer's thinking. I'm only a programmer - with a programmer's brain. Why use licensing terms I can't understand myself?
LG> However, what if we compose a special FreeDOS LG> License, best suited to our needs (saying everything about LG> executable packers, library code, inline compiler code, embedded LG> systems use, and so on - all issues that are NOT satisfactory LG> solved by the GPL, for example the ethernal question of the LG> distinction between "combining" and "aggregation", WITHOUT the GPL LG> virus effect), so this "FreeDOS License" becomes yet another item LG> in the following rather long list of GPL-compatible licenses? If this license fits on a single page - maybe. If not, I'll 'invent' my own. some thing like 'Tom's free! open! source! license' tom ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
