Hi!
12-Фев-2004 10:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> I understand you Lucho, but Bart is right: if it's not possible, then just it isn't.
LG> So, we are (OK, I am) in the trap of our own license! The GPL, instead of
LG> giving us freedom, takes it away from *us*, the *developers*! Isn't that
LG> absurd?! :-(
You _may_ get _your own_ code and release it unders other license, but
you can't stole others code. I think, this is very logical.
LG> Besides, nobody has yet written a *real*, convincing argument *why* we have
LG> a "combining" and not "aggregation" between the different parts of a
LG> compressed executable.
Don't know which differences you see between "combining" and
"aggregation", but I already explain 3-4 times why I think, that GPL not
obstruct exepacking by closed source exepacker (aslo as it not prevents
using closed source compiler).
LG> THREE absurds here, all caused by the GPL, which we can't change! Aren't
LG> they TOO MUCH?! :-(
I suggest, that you wrongly understand GPL.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
