Hi, I doubt that. UDMA is nice but it has limited compatibility. You need a PCI system with supported chipset, and some protected mode programs are incompatible to it. It is like UMBPCI: If it works for you, it is nice, but if not, simply do not use it.
Eric.
I believe (and I think Aitor and Bernd agree, since they suggested it) that UDMA is useful enough to modern DOS users that it belongs in 'base', even though no such functionality existed in MS-DOS.
I believe this is consistent with how Microsoft approached DOS. As new technologies became available, Microsoft added a support utility to MS-DOS. For example: POWER to support APM, EMM386/HIMEM to support more than 640k, ...
But if freedos-devel disagrees that UDMA belongs in 'base', I'll move it back to 'util'. What's the rest of the list say? Where does it belong?
-jh
-- Currently playing: DDR:Max2, WarioWareInc, Ratchet&Clank, Sly Cooper
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
