On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:03:28 +0000 (GMT), you wrote: Hi,
>It looks to me that a better naming would have been beta9rc1: beta9, ... >and then instead of beta9rc4 beta12. I agree with Bart's idea. Maybe the naming did mean the distribution "at a certain level" but can it name like "1.0.1=major.feature.bugfix", just a suggestion. Maybe you can figure a better way. >There was a bit of confusion on my side when I understood that beta9rc3 >would be equal to beta9 in September -- so I put up a I decide the version depends on KERNEL and FREECOM. I update the programs one by one. Rgds, Johnson. -------------------------------------------------------- Hong Kong - International Joke Center (after 1997-06-30) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
