On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:40:28 +0200, you wrote: Hi Lucho
Sorry for breaking in ... >Wow! Did I hear right? Do you say this seriously? Who do you think could >sue us, interestingly? And why would he do that? What we did wrong? Killed >anybody? Stole anything? But we need to play the game "safe" enough, I don't know how since I didn't know the law well, but I think after that long discussion some shape of "safe" (condom) come out. Today afternoon I met BAHCL and have a nice talk with him. He did really afraid being sued because of a program that he only got "no profit, no praises, and sweating long working hours of thinking and debugging". AFAIK: 1) Not to distribute the compiler package 2) Binary is safe to distribute (IMO it's a product of compiler, not A PART OF compiler) 3) Program don't have commercial code 4) No PART of the executable packer is distributed with the program Since the capitalist didn't think in a way we think. Make sure everything OK is better. >Only for one day, 1655 people voted at SlashDot that they use FreeDOS. I >assume the real figure is much, much larger. Interestingly, how could >someone sue tens of thousands of users? ;-) Only the "over clever" SCO have this idea! Terrific! Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
