I support your concerns about the tracker. I admit that I had forgotten about it, although I knew of its existence.
Michael Devore escribió:
Absolutely agreed, Bugzilla is too complicated and busy, and the usage documentation is sub-par. But, it's what FreeDOS has, so we need to make the most of it unless and until something better comes along.There was a time in which we had bugtrack, a simple and quite good (for my taste) bug tracking system. I don't mean to go back to bugtrack (as it seemed to happen to that faq-o-matic stuff?), I'd say that porting the bugs to other system (bugtrack or others) would be now a lot of worthless work, that could be better spent in coding and patching bugs.
Just in case it helps, when I have to fill in the bugzilla form, I leave most of the fields empty (I just care about title and the comment, and forget about the rest). Seems to work ;-)
And last but not least, I am not picking mails for any bug recorded in bugzilla either (although it's harder to say because there were no bug reports lately, had one improvement request for KEYB time ago), so yes, there might be a bug in bugzilla, or something we are not doing right about it.
Aitor
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
