Hi!
25-Фев-2005 14:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[email protected]:
>> But! When I replace MS-himem.sys by FD-himem.exe, smartdrv runs! MEMA
>>reports:
MD> So if MS HIMEM reboots or fails with the FreeDOS kernel and/or utility
MD> setup, what do you want done with FreeDOS HIMEM?
I say neither that MS-HIMEM reboots with FD (conversely, it works - I
already shows you result of EMM386 tests under FD kernel) nor that I want
something from FD-HIMEM. I say about troubles with EMM386, when it runs over
MS-HIMEM both in FD and MS-DOS.
>>PS: I already reported about incompatabilities between FD-EMM386 and
>>MS-HIMEM earlier. For example, 2004-07-13 I wrote: "something wrong happen
>>when used (under FreeDOS) HIMEM 3.95 from Win98: after loading command.com
>>system is rebooted. Bug?".
MD> That would be an incompatibility with FreeDOS HIMEM, not FreeDOS EMM386.
But reboot happen only when MS-HIMEM used with FD-EMM386, without
FD-EMM386 all works smoothly. So, there _is_ some incompatability, but looks
like it lies somewhere between FD-EMM386 and MS-HIMEM.
MD> Correct? But I'm not interested in Win98 support,
Who says about Win98 support?
MD> because it's not a DOS environment
MS-DOS _is_ a "DOS environment", and MS-DOS is our reference.
MD> and likely depends on undocumented internals. And additional
MD> kernel support.
>>PPS: Send you smartdrv.exe and himem.sys?
MD> I have HIMEM.SYS.
And? Send or not?
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
