Hi!
25-Фев-2005 21:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[email protected]:
>> Who says about Win98 support?
MD> You did, in the quote I quoted.
Sorry, may English is poor, but I wrote: "when used (_under FreeDOS_)
HIMEM 3.95 _from_ Win98".
>> MS-DOS _is_ a "DOS environment", and MS-DOS is our reference.
MD> I'm happy for it. You specifically mentioned Windows 98, which I have no
MD> current interest in supporting.
I mention Win98 as owner of MS-DOS 7.1, from where come testbed
MS-HIMEM and SMARTDRV.
MD> The nested, interleaved, and occasionally contradictory comments have
MD> become difficult for me to parse.
All what I say:
- SMARTDRV reboots when MS-EMM386 replaced by FD-EMM386 under MS-DOS 7.1.
- unimportant, which options used for FD-EMM386 in previous test.
- replacing MS-HIMEM by FD-HIMEM solves the problem.
- same trouble (incompatability of FD-EMM396 with MS-HIMEM) happens also
under FD.
No more, no less. Where is contradiction?
MD> If you want me to test something under
MD> FreeDOS, send it to me and I'll test it.
May you send me _your current_ kernel.sys and command.com (my archives
currently outdated, and there was many intermediated subreleases) and I
retest latest fd-emm386+ms-himem under this configuration?
MD> The failure should neither depend on intermixing operating systems and
MD> memory managers versions,
Isn't FD-EMM386 should be compatible with MS software (OS and himem)?
MD> nor reference problems outside of FreeDOS operation.
Same as above?
MD> Those types of issues may, or may not, be addressed at a future date.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
