Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!27-Июн-2005 18:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to "freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>: JH> about Sept 2004, if they had any traffic to speak of. That means the JH> lists to close down would be freedos-devel-net, freedos-kernel, JH> freedos-freecom, freedos-cvs, and fd-doc-list. JH> So, I'd like to close down these 5 lists, and just have all traffic go JH> to freedos-devel. What do you think? Let me disagree - even if traffic in -kernel and -cvs is currently low, content of these lists (and especially -cvs) is completely irrelevant to other lists. Ie. I think, most discusses over kernel coding/sources is not very interested for other utilities developers, which reside in -devel.
Hi Arkady! I think you missed the followup post:
Jeremy would like to keep freedos-cvs and freedos-kernel, but I think it's safe to assume we can close down the other lists I mentioned. I'll comment out freedos-devel-net, freedos-freecom, and fd-doc-list from the FreeDOS Mailing Lists page. If no further objections, I'll close down these 3 lists via SourceForge over the weekend. Please move discussion threads from those lists to freedos-devel. The lists that will remain open are freedos-cvs, freedos-kernel, freedos-user, freedos-devel. The FreeDOS-32 developers have their own freedos-32-dev list, and I'll still link to them from our pages.
So -cvs and -kernel are staying. -- I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
