> Hi, now that DOSLFN has grown far better than the outdated LFNDOS, *now* ? did I miss something ?
> does everybody agree to remove LFNDOS from the official FreeDOS > software list (LSM database)? no. actually the *whole* LSM database sucks anyway (in case of LFNDOS, it's completely outdated, and both links point to 404); try to make a *sensible* database, possible even with something useful like 'to download current version klick [here]' > I am asking because there was once > a project to link LFNDOS to some kernel hooks, if *I* would do anything like that, I'd start with 'C' sources, not with some funny ASM stuff. so I'd like to keep it around. > allowing a quite > performant LFN support, but now that LFNDOS got so deprecated, who deprecated it ? > I > think we can just as well try to connect DOSLFN to those kernel > hooks as soon as we feel some urge to have high-speed LFN. I'd leave the decision what, when and how to hook/link/etc. to the actual developer - should one ever volunteer :/ tom ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
