On 5/15/07, Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no objection to SVN, but I haven't edited any sources in a
> while so maybe I'm not a good person to chime in. :-)
>
> If we do decide to migrate to Subversion, we should use the SVN
> repository on SourceForge (it's not activated yet, but it's there to
> be used.) This helps to keep all FreeDOS-related resources in one
> place.
yes, of course, that's the idea. Also, to have the directories
structured like this:
root
\kernel\trunk
\branches\UNSTABLE
\jhall
\tags\....
\freecom\trunk
\...
\install\...
\mem\...
instead of the default you'd get from cvs2svn that looks like this:
root
\trunk\kernel
\freecom
\...
\branches\UNSTABLE
\jhall
\jimtabor
\expExec
\...
\tags\com083beta7
\ke2035a
\...
The problem is that in this default layout all branches are lumped
together without you always knowing if it's freecom or kernel without
looking inside
well, I can provide a dump file if it gets the go ahead.
Bart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
