Pat, > Interestingly enough, a lot of responses seem not care about new > development. That's not true.
There's a big difference between 'no new API' and 'no new developement' In fact one of the biggest improvement to DOS - which is useful to ANY user - is completely new (if you count 2003 as 'new'), was never before even attempted in DOS, and is completely API independent. I'm talking about Jack's UDMA drivers. > Some even go as far as saying that whatever we have for > dos extenders, memory managers, etc., is good enough. Does this mean > that there is no new development expected from the majority of FreeDOS > developers? No. I mentioned a couple of things that might be made or made better. OTOH it looks like the majority of FreeDOS developers thinks, that the job to have a free DOS is done; time to retire ;) Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
