I prefer LIB and INCLUDE, not INC. Yes, that's the UNIX geek in me, but at least "lib" and "include" is already a standard in UNIX, so it makes sense for us to at least try to reuse it. May make porting UNIX apps to FreeDOS a little easier, if you don't have to modify a bunch of makefiles to use INC instead of "include". Since DOS is case-insensitive, INCLUDE and "include" are equivalent.
-jh On 1/7/08, Aitor Santamaría <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But at least it helps if I know that ANY lib would be in certain path, > and I can adjust all my makefiles to it. > It is even worse if I have to be manually tunning makefiles everytime > I download new version for libraries. > > A third option would be: ok, make both LIB and their H files under > SOURCE, but at least, allow to define some standard path as: > > SOURCE\LIB > SOURCE\INC > > for that. > > Aitor > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel