I prefer LIB and INCLUDE, not INC. Yes, that's the UNIX geek in me,
but at least "lib" and "include" is already a standard in UNIX, so it
makes sense for us to at least try to reuse it. May make porting UNIX
apps to FreeDOS a little easier, if you don't have to modify a bunch
of makefiles to use INC instead of "include". Since DOS is
case-insensitive, INCLUDE and "include" are equivalent.

-jh

On 1/7/08, Aitor Santamaría <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But at least it helps if I know that ANY lib would be in certain path,
> and I can adjust all my makefiles to it.
> It is even worse if I have to be manually tunning makefiles everytime
> I download new version for libraries.
>
> A third option would be: ok, make both LIB and their H files under
> SOURCE, but at least, allow to define some standard path as:
>
> SOURCE\LIB
> SOURCE\INC
>
> for that.
>
> Aitor
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to