Hi Martin,

> On an expansion of before. Just like BSD and Linux are relatives of
> each other and just as capable of each other, why shouldn't DOS be
> able to be just as capable as its relative Windows?

BSD and Linux have a culture of source-based software, often
even open source. With acceptable extra effort, software can
be made compatible with both Unix-ish systems, BSD and Linux,
today usually including MacOS which has a BSD kernel but a
very non-Unix GUI (although people often run X on it so you
can run GUI apps from the Linux / BSD family). However, all
that only works if you can recompile your software for the
Operating System Relative Of Your Choice. The question is if
the apps that make DOS popular are typically open source and
if a suitable compiler would also be available on, eg ported
to, the suggested "modern OS which is a relative of DOS" and
in what way that software would run better on that new DOS.
And of course which NEW software would run only in the newer
DOS because classic DOS was not powerful enough to run them.

> The DOS limitations are the limitations of old technology which are
> no longer current limitations.

Maybe. On the other hand, adding GUI and other modern things
to the basics of DOS, as OS/2 did, is not automatically the
way to make a good OS with enough users. Of course for this
specific case, I think it was rather the non-tech powers of
MS to drag users to Windows and not problems with the OS/2
technology itself that kept OS/2 from being successful?

Also, how much nice software existed in special OS/2 versions?

If people only wanted to run Windows software on something nicer
than MS Windows, OS/2 would be comparable to what ReactOS is now.

Eric



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to