> Nevermind... figured it out. The IDE set the default language to QB > compatibility. Duh.
Duh! Didn't know that FreeBASIC would have a DOS IDE, even less one defaulting to "lang QB". BTW, FreeBASIC 1.01.0 is out, it still mostly works, and supports DOS. > I don't see yet how your 'simple shell' would enhance FreeDOS. > what parts does it better then FreeCOM in what specific way? Note that you can't replace FreeCOM by your 'simple shell' compiled using FBC for the simple reason that FBC doesn't support 16-bit 8086 target. Hacking on "-gen GCC" and subsequently compiling with WATCOM might be theoretically possible but is not something that would work out of the box. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
