Agreed. Also, I recall Stallman didn't like the license used in the
OpenWatcom compiler. And that the kernel couldn't be compiled using an
entirely free software tool chain.
On Feb 10, 2016 5:15 PM, "Louis Santillan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Not all parts of FreeDOS meet the FSF's requirements[0]. One, it's
> not a "GNU/Linux" system. Two, there are few tools in BASE [1] which
> are open source but not necessarily 4 freedoms OSS [2]. Jack Ellis'
> work and SHSUCDX being prime examples.
>
> [0] http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
> [1] http://freedos.sourceforge.net/software/?cat=base
> [2] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Henrik Schick-Hansen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was just wondering why freedos is not listed on fsf (free software
> > foundation) ?
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
