Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2411 (rcal)

[Wilhelm Spiegl via Freedos-devel]

Hi,

if you run a md5 checksum over rcal.com on your mentioned sites AND https://rcal.sourceforge.net/

you will find out that all three files have the same hash value, meaning: they are identical.

 

I personally would prefer that you also create a folder rcal for the program as otherwise the consistency and clarity of FDT will be lost.

 

Willi

 

 

Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2024 at 5:56 PM
From: "Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel" <freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: "Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers." <freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Paul Dufresne" <dufres...@zoho.com>
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Interim Build T2411 (rcal)

---- Le sam., 02 nov. 2024 19:51:53 -0400 Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel a écrit ----
> and fdnpkg considering that 1.01 > 1.0.1
> and frankly at first glance I would agree: 01 is bigger than 0
Seems fdnpkg correctly knows which version is more recent.
The problem seems to be that the latest version, 1.0.1 is not yet in:
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/latest/util/rcal/
and so https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/latest/util/rcal.zip is still 1.01 version,
rather than latest 1.0.1

I am unsure how (semi-automatic or manual?) the update is done.

About an rcal directory in util... I tend to prefer not creating it because there is just rcal.com and rcal.txt, and there is no real ambiguity to which
packages they belong to.


_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel