I believe AI needs to be treated like a tool like any other search engine or automation or compiler. If a contribution includes work performed with AI, it needs to cite its sources academically (like IEEE, ACM, or CSE style), and legally (for compliance with GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT, et al). Additionally, the AI contribution needs to attempt to be reproducible and/or its production needs to be documented (Model/version used, chat log, prompts, input artifacts, etc.) and these records should be accompanied with the contribution as part of the 'source'.
I think, otherwise, we risk worthwhile contributions and opportunities for contribution. This would be akin to "requiring" every that produces a contribution for FreeDOS must use 'OpenWatcom C' or 'hand write binary machine code' or some other similarly silly requirement. No one questions whether you use Borland or MS or OpenWatcom or GNU assemblers or compilers today. Because they're tools that make producing the work possible. _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
