Hi! 1-Мар-2004 18:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Gibson) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>RBIL says, that INT21/440D/CX=x84A expects BH on input (with some "lock >>level" - what is it?). How be with this? Also, is it valid to perform >>CX=08xA (not 48xA) on FAT32? Also, in current SYS there are no INT13 >>access; is locking/unlocking is required? SG> You can find the answers to your questions here ... SG> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/win9x/95func_9lm0.asp SG> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/win9x/excluse_0mg5.asp This (additionally to RBIL) answers, that CL=4A used for INT26 (for INT13 should be used CL=4B; BTW, RBIL says, that 4B locks all logical volumes on physical disk, which contains given logical volume). But this not answers other my questions: - is this lock required for INT25? - what is "lock level" in BH (which values and when should be used)? - is it valid to use CH=08 (instead CH=48) on FAT32 with CL=4A/4B? - are lock/unlock calls nested (or instead lock/unlock better use "get current/lock/lock to old state")? PS: Known MS style - documentation makes more questions, than answers. :( PPS: Anyway, non-initialized BH value in SYS is a bug. :( ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
