Hi!
16-Апр-2004 20:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Bart Oldeman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
te> into assembly, and I will never like #pragma aux, even if that saves a
te> few byte.
Let me disagree with you. This is most valid and effective way to
control compiler - in given case describe interface to (external) function.
IMHO, this is much more flexible and better than modifiers (like ASMPASCAL)
and cost only one additional line per each function in header file.
te> IMO this is dos-C, and should be coded in C (which is possible mostly)
:) Some things (especially low level and which are complete in sense of
functionality) may (and should) be implemented in asm. Especially when we
talk about real OS, which may used as base for complex systems.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
