Hi Christian, > seems to be an older issue, but BUFFERSHIGH is not recognised by
BUFFERS are always in the HMA as soon as FreeDOS uses the HMA (DOS=HIGH) unless the BUFFERS are too many to fit in the HMA. Of course one could make BUFFERHIGH a synonym for BUFFERS? ;-) > FreeDOS. Buffers are loaded correctly into HMA, nevertheless FreeDOS > tells me that it does not like this option while it is parsing the > config.sys. Other options like FILESHIGH, LASTDRIVEHIGH etc. are all > found and defined in config.h / config.c. As far as I remember, FILESHIGH / LASTDRIVEHIGH is something from "Windows 95/98 DOS" which puts the data structures in question into UMB, not into HMA...? What you would/should do in FreeDOS is "DOSDATA=UMB" which puts all FILES, LASTDRIVE and so on data which can be moved into UMB into UMB :-). Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
