Thanks for everybody's suggestions! It's great to finally get some
input on this.
Ok, maybe it would simplify things if I tell what I have tried...
I have tried:
1. Different DOSEMU versions, v1.2 through v1.4 (+beta) - with
different DOS version mentioned in point 2.
2. Different DOS systems, (MS-DOS 4 to 6.22, Dr.DOS, FreeDOS and even
Windows 95 (ver.7)
3. Different server-side file sharing capabilities, NFS, SAMBA, etc.
The ONLY working one under test scenarios was dosbox, but it did not
help me any bit because dosbox has no printing support! Yes I know
printing to a file and then printing out of the Linux system is a
option, but it is not feasible in my clients situation or his program.
I am beginning to think that the problem might be with dosemu +
foxbase, because dosbox works so perfectly. Unfortunatly dosbox has no
"console-only" (run without X) and printing support, otherwise it
would have been done by now...
Thanks for all the help!
My next step would be to go CentOS + IBCS-3.4 with userspace x286emul.
(Anyone got experience with that?)
On Jan 17, 2008 5:04 PM, Keith Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> I did load share. Sorry I should have mentioned that. For testing
> purposes, linux permissions are open on 777 recursively, but still the
> same problem. I have been struggling with this for 2 months allready.
> Even tried putting the shared files on a CIFS server. Same results.
> On Jan 17, 2008 4:33 PM, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi! (please use plain text mail without html)
> > > Is there anybody that runs Foxbase+ V.2.0 for DOS on FreeDOS?
> > > What I am trying to achieve is run a foxbase application on Linux
> > > with DOSEMU and freedos. Right.
> > Maybe you get better results if you load SHARE... Please also
> > compare diskimage (can be diskette or special DOSEMU FAT16 as
> > generated by dosemu tools) drives to "Linux directory used as
> > drive" drives.
> > Problems when several users access the same file sound like
> > shared file access problems :-).
> > > Even though no one is editing the file. The users should still be able
> > > to "view" the database even if no one is editing the current dbf file.
> > Eric
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Freedos-user mailing list