Eeheh! Thanks Eric!
> [when running MODE CON CODEPAGE ... you get this?] yep >> invalid opcode at 000B 0000 0002 >> 03C8 259F 044E 2AEB 0667 034A FEF8 >> 0000 0000 0647 >> >> kernel from Rugxulo: >> http://rugxulo.googlepages.com/fatsecurity-binaries.zip >> >> autoexec.bat: >> @echo off >> set TZ=X)Y) > > Do not set TZ, it confuses info-zip zip and unzip. oh, interesting... i didn't know that >> prompt $p$g >> set path=a:\dos >> set NLSPATH=A:\DOS\NLS >> set LANG=PT >> >> lh DISPLAY CON=(VGA,,1) > > Maybe vga,437,1 instead? LH makes no sense without emm386... actually i would use it with 850 cp which pt-br, it seems to 'run better' with no value ie: if i try to use display con=(vga,850,1) the screen get a strange format i mean, words appear just the 'half to up' part a la strikethrough char... and yeah, i just forgot to load(and say that) himem ou xmgr(from uide) works :) >> mode con codepage prepare=((850) a:\dos\ega.cpx) >> mode con codepage select=850 >> a:\doskeyb br,850,a:\dos\keyboard.sys /ID:275 > > Try MKEYB instead, just in case. let me see, but keyb works fine here >> lh fdapm apmdos > > Try without LH would lh impact fdapm? >> config.sys: >> screen=0x12 > > Try without SCREEN... > >> dos=high,umb >> buffers=15,0 >> files=100 > > That is VERY much. Maybe too much. uhm, Alain is using in this way i hope/wish he knows what he does :) >> fcbs=4,0 >> country=055,850,a:\dos\country.sys > > That probably only has effect with the unstable kernel branch. so, it won't work on Rugxulo's kernel? >> also, i can't execute fdapm coldboot >> and some other softwares crash > > Maybe broken ram? Bad command.com? my mistake here i 'dd'ed' a floppy... now solved :) >> ie: edit > > Edit 0.7d or edit 0.9a? edit 0.9a which still crashing in a random way :( >> btw, i was looking at display and mode to update my floppy >> and it seems display 0.13 is incompatible with mode 2005may12? >> is it correct? > > Dunno, try the one from rugxulo.googlepages.com floppy distro? just forgot it.. ehehe :) >> also which mem extender should i use now? >> it seems Jemm is better/only supported? > > Well jemm386 and himemx is more classic than jemmex. > I think jemm386 and himemx are better than emm386 and himem. > But you may have to do more work to get a DOS friendly and > hardware compatible config, emm386 / himem were more DOS-ish. Thanks! Geraldo São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt site: http://exdev.sf.net/ msn: geraldo_boca_at_hotmail.com skype: geraldo-netto icq: 145-061-456 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
