On 12/16/2014 4:01 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>> Even if all Intel based PCs are equipped with 64bit capable CPUs, they
>> will just as happy run 32bit or even 16bit code just fine.
> Assuming OS support is there.  The instruction set is the same.
> Various system calls may not be.  If you want to run DOS apps on a 64
> bit Windows machine, you need a VM or emulator.  They won't run
> "native".
Considering that this is a FreeDOS mailing list, you can run FreeDOS 
natively on any such machine. The only immediate hurdle on machines less 
than a year or so old is if they have a UEFI ony BIOS, but even then, 
you can work around that.
>> And there are as mentioned above now with the Intel Quark X1000
>> processor again 32bit, single core/thread CPUs coming out for which a
>> 16bit FreeDOS can be a very viable option for an OS to run on...
>> DOS is not dead but people need to treat DOS as DOS, not as a second
>> coming of Linux...
> The fundamental issue for DOS is exactly what you *do* with it, and
> *why* you might use DOS in preference to something else like Linux.
> The fact that something  *can* run DOS doesn't necessarily mean it
> *should*.
Works the other way around as well. Just because you can get basic web 
browsing features or other uses of the Internet on (Free)DOS, doesn't 
mean you should either...


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
Freedos-user mailing list

Reply via email to