John Dennis wrote:
I just noticed a problem when trying to create an F11 IPA virtual machine in our virtlab. I happened to be using the profile Fedora-11-i386-freeipa.I'm pretty sure that if you have installed the fedora-ds packages, doing a "yum upgrade" will replace them with the 389 packages. All of the 389 packages are designed to both Provides: and Obsoletes: their fedora ds counterparts.The cobbler install pauses because it can't find the fedora-ds-* packages. That makes sense (possibly) because the packages are now 389-ds-*But I happened to notice, and Nathan confirmed the F11 repo has both fedora-ds and 389-ds. I'm presuming 389-ds obsoletes fedora-ds but fedora-ds continues to live in the repo because if someone initially installed fedora-ds in F11 then a yum upgrade won't automatically move them over to 389-ds. Does anybody know if that's true?
Anyway I'm confused, if both fedora-ds and 389-ds are in the F11 repo why did the kickstart fail to find fedora-ds?
Good question.
Should we edit the profiles to change fedora-ds to 389-ds on F11 and rawhide? I found the profiles on gordo but I didn't want touch them yet.
Yes. Everything should be using 389 instead of fedora ds.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
