On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 09:48 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > > > One thing I dislike about the discussion, and while I let it pass in > > bugs and mailing list discussions, I think it is wrong to put it in > > public design documents. The statement "autofs abuses the nsswitch.conf > > configuration file" I find a little offensive. autofs uses that > > configuration file and parses only the "automount" entry using the same > > semantic behavior as nss, so the word "abuse" is wrong and a little rude > > IMHO. > > I'm sorry -- I didn't mean to offend you and perhaps abuse was a strong > word. I've changed the design docs.
Please don't get me wrong, I'm happy for people to say what they think within mailing list discussions and, to a lesser extent, within bug discussions, but in a web presented design document a little more care really should be taken IMHO. Ian _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel