Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:05 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 22:38 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
When invalid data is passed, an unhandled decimal exception could
be raised in Decimal number conversion. Handle the exception
more gracefully and report proper ipalib.errors.ConversionError.

https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2705

I'm being pedantic but I think the Decimal special values need to be
handled better. Using Infinity returns a rather odd message:

$ ipa dnsrecord-add example.com
Record name: foo
Please choose a type of DNS resource record to be added
The most common types for this type of zone are: A, AAAA

DNS resource record type: LOC
LOC Degrees Latitude: 90
[LOC Minutes Latitude]: 59
[LOC Seconds Latitude]:
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
    >>>    LOC Seconds Latitude: quantize result has too many digits for
current context
[LOC Seconds Latitude]: Infinity
    >>>    LOC Seconds Latitude: quantize with one INF

And using NaN raises an unhandled exception:

[LOC Seconds Latitude]: NaN
ipa: ERROR: InvalidOperation: comparison involving NaN
Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/cli.py", line 1263, in run
        sys.exit(api.Backend.cli.run(argv))
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/cli.py", line 1049, in run
        kw = self.argv_to_keyword_arguments(cmd, argv[1:])
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/cli.py", line 1035, in
argv_to_keyword_arguments
        self.prompt_interactively(cmd, kw)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/cli.py", line 1199, in
prompt_interactively
        callback(kw)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/plugins/dns.py", line 2147,
in interactive_prompt_callback
        user_options = param.prompt_parts(self.Backend)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/plugins/dns.py", line 768, in
prompt_parts
        self.__get_part_param(backend, part, user_options, default)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/plugins/dns.py", line 747, in
__get_part_param
        output_kw[name] = part(raw)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/parameters.py", line 556, in
__call__
        self.validate(value, supplied=self.name in kw)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/parameters.py", line 879, in
validate
        self._validate_scalar(value)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/parameters.py", line 893, in
_validate_scalar
        error = rule(ugettext, value)
      File "/home/rcrit/redhat/freeipa/ipalib/parameters.py", line 1244, in
_rule_minvalue
        if value<    self.minvalue:
      File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/decimal.py", line 884, in __lt__
        ans = self._compare_check_nans(other, context)
      File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/decimal.py", line 786, in _compare_check_nans
        self)
      File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/decimal.py", line 3866, in _raise_error
        raise error(explanation)
InvalidOperation: comparison involving NaN
ipa: ERROR: an internal error has occurred

Otherwise it does what it should.

rob

Thanks for being pedantic, I found out that Decimal number validation
and normalization needs more care, dnsrecord-add would also fail with
values such as "1E4" or "-0".

Attached patch improves Decimal number validation a lot and adds
optional exponent normalization. I also added missing tests for all
Decimal Parameter attributes.

Martin

Getting some lint errors. Ran out of time to investigate but its strange
because AFAICT these are members.

ipalib/parameters.py:1266: [E1101, Decimal._enforce_numberclass]
Instance of 'Decimal' has no 'numberclass' member
ipalib/parameters.py:1271: [E1101, Decimal._enforce_numberclass]
Instance of 'Decimal' has no 'numberclass' member
ipalib/parameters.py:1288: [E1101, Decimal._remove_exponent] Instance of
'Decimal' has no 'exponential' member


I assume you run this lint:

# ./make-lint ipalib/parameters.py

This produces a lot of false positive lint errors... But if you run lint
for the entire project, my patches will pass:

# git
apply 
/home/mkosek/freeipa-mkosek-275-2-decimal-parameter-conversion-and-normalization.patch
# ./make-lint
#

That's why 275-2 includes a change for make-lint to not report these new
attributes:
diff --git a/make-lint b/make-lint
index 
7ecd59d7e8c5a644f812d4b8987866e7d06236b5..30c5e00c1f0606c75ff1f7fec675ff673a6b87a0
 100755
--- a/make-lint
+++ b/make-lint
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ class IPATypeChecker(TypeChecker):
               'csv', 'csv_separator', 'csv_skipspace'],
           'ipalib.parameters.Bool': ['truths', 'falsehoods'],
           'ipalib.parameters.Int': ['minvalue', 'maxvalue'],
-        'ipalib.parameters.Decimal': ['minvalue', 'maxvalue', 'precision'],
+        'ipalib.parameters.Decimal': ['minvalue', 'maxvalue', 'precision',
+                                      'numberclass', 'exponential'],
           'ipalib.parameters.Data': ['minlength', 'maxlength', 'length',
               'pattern', 'pattern_errmsg'],
           'ipalib.parameters.Enum': ['values'],


Bottom line - I do not think there is a lint problem with my patch :-)

Martin


This was output from './make-lint'. It blew up when I was trying to
build the rpms.

rob

Hm, I guess you have a different version of pylint, mine is error-less
(I use pylint-0.25.1-1.fc17.noarch).

Anyway, I have disabled the false positive pylint errors you reported,
it should not hurt and will keep your build clean. Updated patch is
attached.

Martin

ACK, pushed to master

rob

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to