On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 19:01 +0100, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 02:04 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 12:42 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 10/29/2013 10:49 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Patch 0080 adds userClass attribute for users to IPA CLI.
> >>> Patch 0081 adds userClass attribute for users and hosts to the web UI.
> >>>
> >>> Design page:
> >>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V3/Integration_with_a_provisioning_systems
> >>>
> >>> Tickets:
> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3588
> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3590
> >> NACK to just extending posixAccount objectclass. This is a standard 
> >> objectclass
> >> defined by RFC 2307 and we cannot just simply extend and overwrite it as 
> >> we wish.
> > Uhh indeed this is a big No-no.
> >
> >> We will need to come up with some custom objectclass, like ipaUser. This 
> >> is the
> >> reason why I wrote to ticket "A second goal of this ticket is to review 
> >> current
> >> objectClass hierarchy of users and do changes if needed." so that we can 
> >> pick
> >> the best option where to place it.
> > userClass is used in ipaHost, so I guess it could be instead add to an
> > ipa objectclass. ipaObject might be used perhaps, otherwise we'll need a
> > new ipaUser objectlass.
> >
> > Simo.
> >
> 
> If there are no objections to using the ipaObject objectclass, the attached
> patches implement this approach.

After some thinking ipaObject is more generic than just users, not sure
that attaching userClass there is appropriate. I think we really need
ipaUser at this point.

> Also, the schema change has been added to the appropriate .ldif file, and the
> addeer dialogs in the web UI have been extended to support the new userclass
> attribute.

good.

Simo.


-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to