On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:16 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote: > > On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote: > > >> On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> these patches implements the OTP Web UI. > > >>> > > >>> Last 5 patches is the OTP UI. > > >>> > > >>> First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them. > > >>> General password dialog is introduced to avoid another implementation. > > >>> > > >>> Self-service UI is implemented to be very simple. Atm user can choose > > >>> only token name. Admin interface allows to enter all values. > > >>> > > >>> It's based on the RCUE work -> we need to push RCUE first. Thanks > > >>> Nathaniel for review of the last font package. It will speed things up. > > >>> > > >>> Know bugs: > > >>> - there is clash in id's of checkboxes preventing editation of > > >>> subsequently displayed ones with the same name. Will be fixed in > > >>> separate patch. > > >>> - bugs caused by bugs in API (adding/removal of own tokens in > > >>> self-service, inability to enter key on token creation - > > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4099) > > >>> - datetime format (widget+validator) will be implemented in separate > > >>> patch > > >>> - no support of not reviewed CLI patches (HOTP..) > > >>> > > >>> Cgit: > > >>> http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pvoborni/public_git/freeipa.git/log/?h=otp > > >>> > > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3369 > > >>> > > >> > > >> patch 540-1 has been updated > > >> - QR code is centered > > >> - QR code correction level was lowered from H to M > > >> > > >> All other current patches from sub-threads are attached as well (it was > > >> getting hard to keep track of them). > > > > > > When specifying a token using the admin user, the token URI generated is > > > invalid. > > > > > Yes, but that's API issue: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4169 > > I agree there is an API issue part of this. However, I think the UI > would be cleaner without the "default" radio button. Putting on my admin > hat, when I look at that page I immediately think "What is the > default!?" I think it would be better to leave out the "default" option > and just have the actual default value selected by default.
API-side of this problem is fixed here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2014-February/msg00093.html Nathaniel _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
