On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:16 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> > On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> > >> On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
> > >>>
> > >>> Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
> > >>>
> > >>> First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them.
> > >>> General password dialog is introduced to avoid another implementation.
> > >>>
> > >>> Self-service UI is implemented to be very simple. Atm user can choose
> > >>> only token name. Admin interface allows to enter all values.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's based on the RCUE work -> we need to push RCUE first. Thanks
> > >>> Nathaniel for review of the last font package. It will speed things up.
> > >>>
> > >>> Know bugs:
> > >>> - there is clash in id's of checkboxes preventing editation of
> > >>> subsequently displayed ones with the same name. Will be fixed in
> > >>> separate patch.
> > >>> - bugs caused by bugs in API (adding/removal of own tokens in
> > >>> self-service, inability to enter key on token creation -
> > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4099)
> > >>> - datetime format (widget+validator) will be implemented in separate 
> > >>> patch
> > >>> - no support of not reviewed CLI patches (HOTP..)
> > >>>
> > >>> Cgit:
> > >>> http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pvoborni/public_git/freeipa.git/log/?h=otp
> > >>>
> > >>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3369
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> patch 540-1 has been updated
> > >> - QR code is centered
> > >> - QR code correction level was lowered from H to M
> > >>
> > >> All other current patches from sub-threads are attached as well (it was
> > >> getting hard to keep track of them).
> > >
> > > When specifying a token using the admin user, the token URI generated is
> > > invalid.
> > >
> > Yes, but that's API issue: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4169
> 
> I agree there is an API issue part of this. However, I think the UI
> would be cleaner without the "default" radio button. Putting on my admin
> hat, when I look at that page I immediately think "What is the
> default!?" I think it would be better to leave out the "default" option
> and just have the actual default value selected by default.

API-side of this problem is fixed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2014-February/msg00093.html

Nathaniel

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to