On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 18:21 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > On 23.7.2014 11:14, Petr Spacek wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I have noticed that Fedora is heavily using project FedOAuth: > > > > Federated Open Authentication > > "FedOAuth is a provider for federated authentication mechanisms with a > > modular > > authentication backend." > > > > It sounds somewhat similar to our Ipsilon project and it is also written in > > Python. > > > > Maybe it would be beneficial to somehow cooperate ... > > There is silence like in a grave so I have tried to contact FedOAuth people in > https://github.com/FedOAuth/FedOAuth/issues/61 > > And I have got a reply! > > " > > It seems that FedOAuth and Ipsilon projects are somehow similar. Maybe it > would be beneficial to cooperate and possibly share some code. > [...] > > Hi, this would certainly be interesting. > I've got SAML, OpenID, OpenID Connect and Persona providers currently, and > for > backends I currently have the Fedora Account System, a preconfigured user, > LDAP, kerberos and a database-backed module. > What was your exact idea for collaboration? > " > https://github.com/FedOAuth/FedOAuth/issues/61#issuecomment-50056634 > > From this text, it seems that FedOAuth is light years away (more mature) > than > Ipsilon - and FedOAuth is actually used in production now (by Fedora > infrastructure). > > > So the inevitable questions are: > - What can Ipsilon do and what can't be done with FedOAuth? > - Can we simply add missing features to FedOAuth? > I.e. > - Is it worth to spend more time on Ipsilon? > > Sorry Simo, this is not a meant as personal attack! :-)
Oh I do not take it personally at all, I will take a look and see how much overlap there is. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel