On 25/09/14 09:59, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/24/2014 06:22 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 24/09/14 17:30, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/24/2014 04:55 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
Patch attached

This probably should go to 4.0.x, 4.1 and master
It is obvious that this interface was designed this way. So you should
elaborate more on the "should" part, list use cases where current approach does
not work, link to tickets, ...

Sorry for that, I though I broke it during refactoring.
Not so fast, pardner :-) I checked with 3.3.3 and this *was* indeed changed
during your refactoring. My main point was that you should be clear about your
intents and reasons for the patch, that a mere "should" is not clear to 

ACK to your patch though, works fine and restores the behavior - time to add
tests?. I just adjusted the commit message a little before pushing.

Pushed to:
master: 2f1f1221701160ebeb4f23078adce3af59892162
ipa-4-1: 7a99f22ee0a4c5fd1d41722fa0101fee74e0c76e
ipa-4-0: 32b6eb5110b2f851fbedb39ac0d853b46087465f

Thanks, I will add tests next week.

Martin Basti

Freeipa-devel mailing list

Reply via email to