On 3.12.2014 14:38, Gabe Alford wrote:
> Yeah. This is what I was talking about ipaclient builds still relying on
> Makefile.am. Plus if you remove the ipaclient/Makefile.am and then run
> `make rpm`, it fails to find the *.py files to package into the rpm.
> 
> Gabe
> 
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Martin Kosek <mko...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/03/2014 05:13 AM, Gabe Alford wrote:
>>> This patch removes the changelog and Makefile.am for ipaclient as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gabe
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Martin Kosek <mko...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/01/2014 04:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>>>> Gabe Alford wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Martin Kosek <mko...@redhat.com
>>>>>> <mailto:mko...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 11/30/2014 03:28 AM, Gabe Alford wrote:
>>>>>>     > Ignore the last patch. Updated patch attached.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Gabe Alford
>>>>>>     <redhatri...@gmail.com <mailto:redhatri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     >> This patch removes the app_PYTHON usage.
>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>     >> Thanks,
>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>     >> Gabe
>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>     >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Martin Kosek <
>> mko...@redhat.com
>>>>>>     <mailto:mko...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>     >>> Exactly, this was the message from Martin :-) I did not test
>> it
>>>>>>     myself,
>>>>>>     >>> but
>>>>>>     >>> removing all app_PYTHON should be benign given we use Python
>>>>>>     setup.py
>>>>>>     >>> packaging.
>>>>>>     >>>
>>>>>>     >>> On 11/27/2014 04:27 PM, Gabe Alford wrote:
>>>>>>     >>>> Thanks guys. Sounds like it would be better to submit a patch
>>>> that
>>>>>>     >>> removes
>>>>>>     >>>> app_PYTHON if it is considered dead code.
>>>>>>     >>>>
>>>>>>     >>>> Gabe
>>>>>>     >>>>
>>>>>>     >>>> On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Petr Spacek <
>>>> pspa...@redhat.com
>>>>>>     <mailto:pspa...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>     >>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>> On 27.11.2014 11:00, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>     >>>>>> On 27/11/14 00:50, Gabe Alford wrote:
>>>>>>     >>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>        Wondering if I could get a review. Updated patch
>>>>>>     attached.
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>     >>>>>>> Gabe
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Gabe Alford
>>>>>>     <redhatri...@gmail.com <mailto:redhatri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>     >>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>> <mailto:redhatri...@gmail.com <mailto:
>> redhatri...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>>     <javascript:;>>> wrote:
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>     Hello,
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>     Fix for https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4700
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>     Gabe
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>     >>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>> sorry for late response.
>>>>>>     >>>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>>> We push this ticket to backlog, as it would be part of
>> build
>>>>>>     system
>>>>>>     >>>>> refactoring.
>>>>>>     >>>>>> The "app_PYTHON" statement is not used anymore in IPA, the
>>>> better
>>>>>>     >>>>> solution is
>>>>>>     >>>>>> remove it, instead of keeping dead code up-to-date.
>>>>>>     >>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>> Just to clarify:
>>>>>>     >>>>> It can be pushed if it works, there is no need to postpone
>>>>>>     accepting
>>>>>>     >>> patch
>>>>>>     >>>>> if
>>>>>>     >>>>> the patch seems okay and doesn't break anything.
>>>>>>     >>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>> Martin, please keep in mind that contributions are welcome
>> at
>>>>>>     any time.
>>>>>>     >>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>> Milestones in Trac reflect our view of priorities but it
>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>     >>> prevent us
>>>>>>     >>>>> from accepting correct patches from contributions at any
>>>> time, no
>>>>>>     >>> matter
>>>>>>     >>>>> which
>>>>>>     >>>>> priority is stated in Trac (or even if there is no ticket
>> for
>>>>>>     it ...).
>>>>>>     >>>>>
>>>>>>     >>>>> --
>>>>>>     >>>>> Petr^2 Spacek
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Worked in my tests, I did not see any breakage. I guess we can
>> also
>>>>>>     remove the
>>>>>>     ipa-client/ipaclient/Makefile.am while we are at it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like the ipaclient/Makefile.am is still being used. I tried
>>>>>> removing it and there were errors in the build, but maybe I am wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is needed to build ipa-join, ipa-getkeytab and ipa-rmkeytab.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to rip out the outdated hg ChangeLog stuff though.
>>>>>
>>>>> rob
>>>>
>>>> I think Gabe was asking about ipa-client/ipaclient/Makefile.am and not
>>>> about
>>>> ipa-client/Makefile.am - we still need this one as Rob correctly said.
>>>>
>>>> The failure that Gabe hit in build probably comes from the the SUBDIR
>>>> reference
>>>> in ipa-client/Makefile.am file. I assume that if the reference is
>> removed,
>>>> the
>>>> removal should work.
>>>>
>>>> And yes, you can remove the Changelog too if you are OK with it :)
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think you did some error during the process. This is what I got:
>>
>> $ git clean -fxd
>> $ git apply ...
>> $ make rpms
>> ...
>> checking that generated files are newer than configure... done
>> configure: creating ./config.status
>> config.status: error: cannot find input file: `Makefile.in'
>> Makefile:84: recipe for target 'client-autogen' failed
>> make: *** [client-autogen] Error 1

Lukas, could you please help us to find a way from the Autotools maze? :-)

Thank you!

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to