On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 15:47 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 27.5.2015 v 15:43 Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 13:57 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >     ipa config-mod --enable-kdcproxy=TRUE
> > > > >     ipa config-mod --enable-kdcproxy=FALSE
> > > 
> > > I don't like this approach, as it is completely inconsistent with
> > > every
> > > other optional component. There should be *one* way to handle 
> > > them
> > > and
> > > there already is one, no need to reinvent the wheel.
> > 
> > Sorry Jan, but this is really the correct approach.
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> > 
> > We want a boolean in LDAP to control whether the IPA Domain allows
> > proxying or not, the code is embedded in the overall framework and 
> > has
> > no need for explicit install/uninstall unlike the CA or DNS 
> > components.
> 
> There is a boolean for every other component/service as well. If you 
> want to add new API to manipulate the boolean, fine, but it should be 
> 
> done in a generic way that works for other components as well.

As I understand the problem, there is an assumption that an optional
component has a distinct service to start and stop. That is not the
case here. This is just new config for apache.

Nathaniel

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to