On 2015-06-23 15:14, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 15:11 +0200, Christian Heimes wrote:
>> On 2015-06-23 14:58, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> I agree. One other small nitpick is that the python-kdcproxy 
>>> dependency
>>> is still wrong. Please make it depend on 0.3. 0.3 is already in 
>>> RHEL
>>> and Fedora. The only remaining step here is to push python-kdcproxy 
>>> in
>>> the same update as the next FreeIPA build.
>> I don't see python-kdcproxy 0.3 on my F22 test VM. It's still
>> python-kdcproxy-0.2.1-1.fc22.noarch. dnf update doesn't pull any 
>> updates
>> either.
> ... because it hasn't been pushed.
> Updates are a two-step process. First you build the new package, then
> you push it. It is currently built, just not pushed. We will push
> FreeIPA and kdcproxy together.

Ah, got it!

What's the simplest way to download and test the new package on my VM?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to