On 08/20/2015 11:52 AM, Martin Basti wrote:


On 08/20/2015 11:42 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Martin

On 08/20/2015 11:33 AM, Martin Basti wrote:


On 08/20/2015 10:18 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi all,

I am trying to run integration tests for dnssec in RHEL-7.2
The tests keep failing at the step of preparing the replica. I figured
out, the ipa-replica-prepare with the standard parameters requests
reverse zone info (does not do it in fedora) which causes the test to
fail.

Does anyone know why does it do it? We can, of course update our tests
adding a --no-reverse option, but I'd like to know how come it behaves
differently depending on the platform.

The system is
dell-pe1950-06.rhts.eng.brq.redhat.com

The command looks like this:

[root@dell-pe1950-06 ~]# ipa-replica-prepare -p '<password>'
--ip-address 10.34.54.25 dell-pe1950-05.rhts.eng.brq.redhat.com
Do you want to configure the reverse zone? [yes]:

Reverse zone is not needed for DNSSEC test, you can use --no-reverse
option.

Did you test fedora on the same machine?
No, it's a beaker-provisioned vm.

I added a --no-reverse to the install_replica method in ipatests/test_integration/tasks.py. It fixed this particular issue. However, now the test fails at the step of ipa-replica-install:

[root@dell-pe1950-05 ~]# ipa-replica-install -U -p '<password>' -w '<password>' --ip-address 10.34.54.25 /var/lib/ipa/replica-info-dell-pe1950-05.rhts.eng.brq.redhat.com.gpg --setup-ca --setup-dns --forwarder 10.34.32.1
WARNING: conflicting time&date synchronization service 'chronyd' will
be disabled in favor of ntpd

ipa : ERROR Unable to resolve the IP address 2620:52:0:2236:215:c5ff:fef3:e54f to a host name, check /etc/hosts and DNS name resolution


Hmm, this is interesting, is 2620:52:0:2236:215:c5ff:fef3:e54f IP address of replica or master.


Does the resolv.conf point to master on replica?

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to