On 03/11/2016 07:24 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 9.3.2016 11:14, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/07/2016 04:28 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/07/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.3.2016 13:27, Jan Cholasta wrote:

On 7.3.2016 12:47, Martin Babinsky wrote:

Shouldn't we rather fix IPA to work with bind running in chroot
(which is
AFAIK considered good security practice)?

I would not invest into it:



Then the patch should be sufficient, yes?

Yes, but I would prefer if the directive was visually separated from
requires and had a comment (see how nss-pam-ldapd conflicts in
freeipa-server is done).


Martin^3 Babinsky
From 14f42f09ffbe0b7c90239d440398bfcd49229f3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Babinsky <mbabi...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:41:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] spec: add conflict with bind-chroot to freeipa-server-dns

 freeipa.spec.in | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/freeipa.spec.in b/freeipa.spec.in
index 9e277020d70215e052ab6c905b1c6a29ae6cdd4d..71a5df0455e021832caa01b5519af5aa612af061 100644
--- a/freeipa.spec.in
+++ b/freeipa.spec.in
@@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ Obsoletes: %{alt_name}-server-dns < %{version}
 # upgrade path from monolithic -server to -server + -server-dns
 Obsoletes: %{name}-server <= 4.2.0
+# FreeIPA does not support running integrated BIND in chroot jail
+Conflicts: bind-chroot
 %description server-dns
 IPA integrated DNS server with support for automatic DNSSEC signing.
 Integrated DNS server is BIND 9. OpenDNSSEC provides key management.

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to