On 27.05.2016 17:33, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 12:25 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 11:01 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/24/2016 04:29 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Using a pragma instead of guards is easier to write, less error
and avoids name clashes (a source of very subtle bugs). This
is supported on almost all compilers, including all the
care about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma_once#Portabili
Makes sense to me. I did not test, just saw a potential
@@ -20,9 +20,6 @@
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/lic
... no pragma there.
Here is a new version with a slightly edited commit message (just to
confirm that we don't edit the autogenerated files).
Attached is a new version that is simply rebased on to master.
** Pushed to master: 4bafba06f2b8cc51cd95a725e1c8adf7bbf9a5fc
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code