On 7.6.2016 10:22, Martin Basti wrote:

On 07.06.2016 09:07, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 6.6.2016 18:29, Martin Basti wrote:

On 03.06.2016 14:28, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 06/03/2016 02:19 PM, Martin Basti wrote:

On 03.06.2016 14:13, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:


please remove it from LDAPAddReverseMember too, it contains the same


Please see the modified patch.



Pushed to master: c56d65b064e1e0410c03cf1206816cad4d8d86cc

I think the attrs_list was supposed to be passed to the
ldap.get_entry() call rather than removed, which would fix that every
reverse member command always acts like --all was specified.

I'm really afraid, what can happen if we put attr_list into get_entry()
instead of '*', because this code were there for 4 years and I don't
feel happy enough to change it now, what we may break.

Should I revert this commit then and postpone the ticket?

It's a bug and should be fixed. The fix is easy so I see no point in postponing it. I see no reason to be really afraid, I'm pretty sure that removing the objectclass attribute (which is invisible in the CLI anyway) from the output of all the 4 commands that use this code won't break anything.

Jan Cholasta

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to